Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Sunak’s Indian escape

Sunak needs to make significant progress this autumn or power might ebb quickly away, says the expert

Sunak’s Indian escape

HEADING to New Delhi for the G20 summit might have felt like a great escape for Rishi Sunak, leaving behind crumbling concrete in classrooms and damning opinion polls for his first visit to India as Prime Minister.

The Sunaks were greeted enthusiastically by the Indian media. A British Prime Minister of Indian origin, paying his first official visit, added human interest to the summit.


Prayers at the spectacular Akshardham Temple displayed the Prime Minister’s Hindu faith more visibly than it has been in Britain. Sunak’s faith is important in his personal life, but peripheral to his politics and policy agenda. He tends to see the lack of attention to his being the first of Britain’s 57 Prime Ministers to practice a minority faith as a positive affirmation of British tolerance.

Sunak declared himself proud to be considered a “son in law” of India and an embodiment of Britain and India’s living links. He has few illusions that his Indian ethnic origin will have any bearing on the hard-headed calculations of the Modi administration.

Indeed, Modi kept world leaders guessing over who was coming to dinner at his house, before dashing Sunak’s hopes by choosing US President Joe Biden instead. Securing the admission of the African Union to the G20 underpinned India’s claim to have emerged as the leader of the global south, perhaps a new non-aligned movement for this century.

Second pic Sunak’s trips to India as part of the G20 summit may provide some of the most memorable images of his time in power (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

Sunak got a businesslike twenty-minute bilateral meeting with Modi at the G20 margins, though he may return again next month for the cricket world Cup, especially if trade talks progress well.

Ironically, if Rishi Sunak had never become Prime Minister, we could well have a UK-India trade deal already, albeit not for particularly good reasons. Liz Truss’s focus on the post-Brexit optics of making deals made her willing to sign up to whatever was quickly negotiable, rather than how to negotiate a deal that the UK would want to sign.

Too much British discussion of a UK-India trade deal obsesses over whether immigration might be a sticking point. This is an outdated hangover effect from sharp UK-India clashes over immigration, especially during Theresa May’s time as Home Secretary before 2016 and as Prime Minister afterwards.

But Boris Johnson’s post-Brexit immigration system introduced everything that the Indian government was pushing for and more – not in a UK-India bilateral deal, but as the UK’s more liberal visa policy for everywhere outside Europe. Maybe the UK missed a post-Brexit trade trick with that unilateral liberalisation of non-EU immigration, and could have held back some of those changes as part of its negotiating hand in future trade deals.

boats at channel Sunak’s bigger problem is over small boats in the English Channel, says Katwala (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

Any trade deal content on immigration now would be technocratic, such as tweaks to the inter-company transfer processes. Indian migration to the UK has never been higher than it is today. Indian nationals had the highest number of student, post-graduate and skilled work visas last year, overtaking China for student visas, and accounting for 46% of skilled work visas too. India contributes significantly to record net migration numbers.

British Future’s latest migration attitudes report, published this week, shows why it is too simplistic to claim that a persistent public demand for lower immigration is ignored by the elites. Rather, politicians and the public are grappling with the dilemmas of control. The 2023 survey was taken shortly after record net migration figures were published, yet the public are evenly split on reducing migration. Just under half (48%) would like overall numbers to fall, compared to two-thirds of the public back in 2016. Those who want reductions are selective and cautions about what to cut.

Comment inset Sunder Sunder Katwala

The post-Brexit points system did deliver a potential control dividend for the government. Numbers are high but the government is often making specific choices about contribution that the public support. Sunak’s bigger problem is over small boats in the Channel. When control matters, the political choice to keep amplifying this issue, on which the government seems to have lost control most spectacularly, is a risky one.

Might the politics of the General Election be slipping beyond Sunak’s control too? He returned from Delhi to a gloomy survey for the Conservative Home website – where eight of ten Conservative members anticipate a Labour-led government after the General Election, with just one in ten expecting a Conservative majority.

Sunak needs to make significant progress this autumn or power might ebb quickly away, long before he faces the voters. Should this ultimately prove to be a two-year caretaker Premiership, Sunak’s trips to India may provide some of the most memorable images of his time in power. His task back in Britain is to persuade his party and the public that he could still deliver a political miracle – and provide the greatest electoral escape of all.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less