Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Tories must tackle race bias of party members’

By Safya khan-ruf

Researcher at Hope Not Hate


IN RECENT times, race and religion have been at the forefront of our politics.

The years prior to the 2019 general election saw the Labour party mired in a battle with antisem­itism. This year we have seen worldwide protests against racial injustice and a pandemic that has hit minority communities the hardest.

The result has been pledges of change – the La­bour leader has committed to clearing prejudice out of his party and the government has promised to investigate the disproportionate effects of Covid-19.

But one problem in our politics that is no closer to being solved or even acknowledged is the deep, widespread and persistent anti-Muslim prejudice across the Conservative party.

Over the last two years, Hope Not Hate has been documenting the prevalence of prejudice in the two main political parties – antisemitism in Labour and Islamophobia in the Tory party. But sadly, the sometimes virulent anti-Muslim prejudice among Conservative members has been overlooked by the both the party and the political establishment.

Last year we documented how 40 per cent of Tory members believed the number of Muslims entering Britain should be lowered; 43 per cent preferred “to not have the country led by a Muslim”, and there was a common belief in the conspiracy theory that areas of the country operated under Sharia law.

The issue was avoided by the party despite the alarm being sounded by prominent Muslim Tories such as Baroness Sayeeda Warsi and Mohamed Amin MBE, who resigned as the chair of the Con­servative Muslim Forum. Then-chancellor Sajid Javid pressured his fellow candidates into promis­ing an inquiry, during a TV leadership debate.

Despite the eventual winner, prime minister Bo­ris Johnson, originally committing to an inquiry, and several delays and prevarications, he eventu­ally announced a wider investigation into all forms of prejudice in the party. While an examination of racism was, of course welcome, the Conservatives’ specific and uniquely deep-seated problems with Islamophobia warranted an investigation of its own.

Earlier this year, we released a dossier of Conservative councillors who had been making and shar­ing anti-Muslim statements in public. Last week, ahead of the weekend’s Tory party conference, Hope Not Hate submitted evidence to the party’s ‘Inquiry on Islamophobia and all forms of racism’, containing the latest evidence of the widespread anti-Muslim prejudice among its members.

Our new polling found that 57 per cent of party members had a negative attitude towards Muslims, with 21 per cent registering a very negative attitude. (More than twice the number of those with nega­tive attitudes towards Hindus and Jewish people)

Nearly half of Conservative party members (47 per cent) believe that Islam is “a threat to the British way of life”, while 58 per cent believed the conspir­acy theory that “there are no-go areas in Britain where Sharia law dominates and non-Muslims cannot enter”. This is in comparison to around a third of the general public believing Islam was a threat, and that there were no-go areas in Britain.

We also presented evidence on 40 Conservative activists, councillors and MPs, including one who referred to Muslims as “parasites”, another who shared a joke comparing Asians with a dog, “He’s brown, he stinks, he’s never worked a f***ing day in his life and he doesn’t speak a word of English” and another who wrote “the problem with Colne is that there are too many takeaways and too many P***s, that’s why people don’t come to Colne”.

At the time of writing, all remained members despite having previously been brought to the at­tention of the party. In the run-up to the 2019 gen­eral election, the then Conservative chairman James Cleverly said he was “confident” there was “a robust mechanism” in place to deal with the issue. Our evidence suggests this is not the case.

Although Johnson promised that when it came to Islamophobia it would be “one bounce and you’re out”, the party’s approach has been closer to a swingball – with members getting hit with a tem­porary suspension before coming right back into the party as if nothing had happened.

We are calling for the Conservatives to adopt an independent complaints and transparent discipli­nary procedure, ensure support and clarity for complainants and a programme of training for members on Islamophobia, anti-Muslim prejudice and understanding of British Muslims.

Despite the lack of progress so far, we still believe that real change is possible, but it needs forward-looking Conservatives to make a stand by admitting there is a problem and demanding a zero-tolerance approach. The issue extends all the way through the party from the top to the bottom, and so it can only ever be solved by a committed coalition of MPs, councillors, activists and members who un­derstand that our country’s Muslim communities are as British as they are.

More For You

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less