Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Trump is America’s Polariser-in-Chief – but US divides run far deeper

Trump's return to the White House in November 2024 would have profound implications for the international order, says the expert

Trump is America’s Polariser-in-Chief – but US divides run far deeper

‘THE United States versus Donald Trump’. The title of the 45-page indictment of the former President could be a TV mini-series title, though the third season plot of this Trump melodrama often seems stranger than fiction would dare.

Trump is now set to spend a fair chunk of his Presidential campaign year tied up in court. Might be keep running for President – or even get elected – while behind bars?


Trump probably won’t be America’s next President, though most people thought that back in 2016. He got lucky then. Hillary Clinton won almost three million more votes, but Trump’s knife-edge wins in key states won him the Electoral College. He was more than five million votes down in 2020 but close results in four states could have flipped the result again.

The indictment says that Trump had the right to claim to have won, even falsely, and to pursue the recounts and lawsuits that failed for a lack of evidence. It alleges that his actions, creating false lists of electors in seven states to press state officials and the Vice President to overturn the result, was an unlawful conspiracy.

It is an exaggeration to claim that the indictment could actually boost Trump’s Presidential chances – but nor does it end them. Most Americans do believe that Joe Biden was elected fairly, by 60 per cent to 30 per cent. But more than half of Republican voters are in that sizeable minority – and another significant chunk don’t see trying to overturn an election result as a disqualification. So Trump remains the runaway leader in the Republican primary polls. Three-quarters of Republicans see these charges as politicised, though in a Reuters poll last week only 28% of Republicans said they would still vote for Trump if he was actually in prison.

GettyImages 1575076913 Nadine Seiler of 'Black Lives Matter' demonstrates outside of the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Court House as she awaits the arrival of former President Donald Trump on August 03, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

The task of leading candidates is usually to introduce and define themselves to the American public. But everybody already has a view about Donald Trump, and not many minds can be changed now. Trump is one of the least popular Presidential candidates in living memory. He is the first former US President for over a century, since Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, to mount a serious campaign to try to get the job back.

Yet the Trump versus Biden 2024 polls are currently tied at 43% each. Biden is unpopular too, grappling with a struggling economy and a divided country. Each man may represent his rival’s best hope of re-election. The depth of American polarisation risks setting politics in concrete, with ever fewer swing voters: 93% of Biden and Trump voters say they would vote the same way again. One problem is that if politics becomes so strongly a question of tribal identity – of two entirely different ideas of America – then performance in government can cease to matter.

We talk too loosely about “culture wars” to mean any old twitterstorm about identity. Used properly, it involves the type of fundamental existential clash that it is not possible to agree to disagree about. As the January 6th insurgency showed, people can feel legitimised to take violence if there is a breakdown over whether and how the democratic political system resolves arguments about who has the right to govern.

LEAD Comment Sunder Katwala byline pic 1 Sunder Katwala

Britain is much less politically polarised than America, to set rather a low bar. In America, wearing a face-mask during the Pandemic almost became like strapping a Presidential ballot paper to your face, with Republicans also much less likely to take a vaccine. There was no such political divide in Britain. Public anger at rule-breaking parties in Boris Johnson’s Downing Street was therefore broadly held across party and referendum divides.

Trump’s chances of returning to the White House in November 2024 currently look considerably stronger than Rishi Sunak’s prospects of remaining in Downing Street beyond the next General Election here.   But Britain still has many swing voters up for grabs, as party allegiances have got weaker rather than stronger. Voters on different sides of Brexit and even Scottish independence can change parties next time.

One of the biggest inoculators against US-style polarisation in Britain is our broadcasting culture. America’s dystopian polarisation is reinforced because, every time anything big happens, the two American political tribes are watching two parallel narratives on channels like CNN and Fox. Fox News paid $787 million to settle a defamation case to the makers of election count machines. The court documents showed that the broadcasters knew that Trump’s claims were false, but feared losing an audience that wanted to hear them.

The trials and tribulations of Donald Trump are not just an issue for a deeply divided America. Trump’s return would have profound implications for the international order too. Donald Trump has undoubtedly become America’s Polariser in Chief – but the challenges of defusing polarisation go much deeper than the ego of one man. 

More For You

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less