Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

‘Business needs clarity, not chaos’

Entrepreneur seeks support amid shifting policies

‘Business needs clarity, not chaos’
Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

IT HAS been difficult to understand the purpose and intent behind the new government’s messages during its first 100 days.

Business owners and entrepreneurs are also “working people,” yet it remains unclear whether Chancellor Rachel Reeves included these wealth creators in her broad definition. The uncertainty extends to her anticipated proposals to raise employers’ national insurance contributions.


Are the “broadest shoulders” proposed to carry the increased burden of taxation – those belonging to business owners and small- and medium-sized enterprises which represent 99.2 per cent of all of the business population in the UK?

At the start of 2023, there were 5.6 million small businesses with 0-49 employees. SMEs account for 60 per cent of total employment and around 50 per cent of all UK private sector turnover. The total employment of SMEs was 16.7 million (61 per cent of the total) while the turnover was estimated at £2.4 trillion (or 53 per cent) of all UK turnover.

Londoners alone contribute £59.3 billion to the Treasury annually, more than a quarter of the total for the whole of England. Central London’s dynamic businesses and rich culture and experiences are not merely job creators: they are critical to the UK’s global competitiveness and growth. When London prospers, so does the rest of the UK. The shoulders of wealth creating London, and its business owners and entrepreneurs should be supported and not burdened.

Even in the City of London’s square mile, 98 per cent or more of all business are SMEs and represent significant contributors to the wider UK economy and to central London, funding public services across the nation.

The City’s square mile has the highest concentration of SMEs anywhere in the UK. Their enterprise needs to be recognised, valued and rewarded.

Does the prime minister mean that central London’s businesses have the “broadest shoulders”? What does Anneliese Dodds (minister for international development and women’s equalities) mean when she promises the gov e r n m e n t will forge “a partnership with business”? Does she mean w o r k i n g with and encouraging businesses and business owners, including those who consider themselves and are certainly “working people?” Many questions require clear, straight[1]forward answers. Business owners and entrepreneurs need clarity and certainty wherever possible, but prevarication and vagueness are unhelpful – especially to investors the government claims it aims to retain and attract.

Tony Matharu

As Labour focuses on its “national mission for growth,” it is imperative it works with and supports central London and its businesses.

The challenges facing global cities like London are significant, and its businesses must have the environment and tools to recover sustainably, foster growth, and enhance their competitive edge over foreign cities to remain the best place to live, work, visit, study, and invest.

Central London and other town centres depend on a mobile population. The proposed flexible working policy threatens business recovery, as reduced commuting means fewer customers. Over 13,000 hospitality businesses have already closed since the pandemic, with four more shutting down daily this year. Businesses cannot survive on three days of real trade and two of virtual meetings. A “Zoom Americano” won’t sustain hospitality, nor will “virtual dry cleaning” replace essential services or keep cultural venues and the night-time economy alive.

Businesses know best how to support, invest in and retain their work force. Governments do not, and any impositions by government must be restricted to stimulating investment and employment. The government must support business ambition to drive growth and revitalise the economy.

(Tony Matharu is the founder and chair of Blue Orchid Hospitality, Integrity International Group, and Central London Alliance CIC)

More For You

UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less