Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

UK to bring in new Bill of Rights to sidestep Europe’s human rights court

The new Bill of Rights that will be put before parliament on Wednesday.

UK to bring in new Bill of Rights to sidestep Europe’s human rights court

Britain will begin legislating on Wednesday for a new Bill of Rights to give the government the power to ignore rulings from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), which last week blocked ministers' plans to send migrants to Rwanda.

Last Tuesday, the ECHR issued last minute injunctions to prevent a handful of asylum seekers being sent to the East African country, meaning Britain's first planned deportation flight did not go ahead on schedule. 

The new Bill of Rights that will be put before parliament on Wednesday will make clear that Britain's Supreme Court, which had allowed the Rwanda flights, had legal supremacy and ECHR decisions did not always need to be followed by British courts.

It would confirm that injunctions issued by the ECHR under its Rule 39, which stopped the Rwandan flight, were not binding, the Ministry of Justice said.

"These reforms will reinforce freedom of speech, enable us to deport more foreign offenders and better protect the public from dangerous criminals," British Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab said.

The government said the new bill would restrict the ability of foreign criminals to use a right to family life to prevent their deportation, and would stop "trivial" human rights cases from getting to court. It will also cement in law greater freedom of the press and freedom of expression, it added.

Lawyers and campaigners said however that the plan would erode people's rights and hand more power to ministers. As it stands, British courts are not bound by ECHR rulings anyway.

Stephanie Boyce, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, said it would create an acceptable class of human rights abuses, while Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK’s Chief Executive, said it was unsurprising that politicians held to account by human rights laws wanted them removed.

"This is not about tinkering with rights. It's about removing them," Deshmukh said.

Some lawmakers in the ruling Conservative Party had wanted Britain to pull out of the European Convention on Human Rights altogether after last week's decision, but Raab said there were no plans to do so.

(Reuters)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Piddington-asylum-vote

Residents place their ballots in a box at the local village hall in Piddington, Oxfordshire, north-west of London on September 15, 2026, as the town of fewer than 400 inhabitants votes on a symbolic referendum on leaving the UK.

(Photo by JUSTIN TALLIS / AFP via Getty Images)

Piddington votes to leave UK over asylum centre

Highlights

  • The village will now call itself the "principality of Piddington", says parish council chair Tim McNally
  • Plan would house 1,200-plus male asylum seekers at a disused military base for at least 10 years
  • Culture secretary Lisa Nandy says the base "will go ahead"

AN ENGLISH village of around 350 people announced on Wednesday (16) that a vast majority of residents had voted yes in an "independence referendum" staged to protest plans to house over 1,200 migrants in a nearby facility.

Keep ReadingShow less