Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

‘Ukraine scheme could be asylum policy blueprint’

Britain needs more than ‘headline-grabbing’ promise to tackle illegal immigration crisis

‘Ukraine scheme could be asylum policy blueprint’

THE British debate on refugees is leading a strange double life.

The government’s policy on asylum is getting ever tougher after a year when more people played an active part in welcoming refugees to Britain than ever before.


It sounds like Groundhog Day in parliament when it comes to asylum. “Anyone who arrives illegally will be deemed inadmissible and either returned to the country they arrived from or a safe third country” was Priti Patel’s pitch to the Commons for last year’s Nationality and Borders Act.

Now prime minister Rishi Sunak and home secretary Suella Braverman suggest that passing one more asylum law this year might finally achieve that. The new law will try to speed up the process where the government believes it can deport somebody – for example to Albania, India or Nigeria.

But, instead of actionable, practical proposals to address the chaos in the Channel, we have a headline-grabbing promise – that nobody who crosses the Channel without permission will be able to claim asylum in Britain. It is a promise, like that made last year, which is bound to be broken. The UK will have to consider the asylum claims of those who cannot be sent anywhere else.

Next Tuesday (14) marks the anniversary of the Homes for Ukraine scheme. It was not only actionable, but also implemented, at speed and considerable scale. Since the war broke out, about 165,000 Ukrainians have sought sanctuary here.

Neighbouring countries have taken a larger share of up to eight million Ukrainian women and children who fled the Russian invasion – more than 1.6 million are seeking sanctuary in Poland.

Yet the 165,000 who have come to Britain is the largest group of refugees to arrive here from any country for more than a century, since a quarter of a million Belgians came to Britain after the First World War broke out.

As an emergency response, this scheme was not perfect. The UK contribution faltered during the first three weeks after the war broke out. While EU states offered visa-free access, post-Brexit Britain was trying to adapt visa routes never designed to apply to refugees fleeing war.

Richard Harrington Richard Harrington (Photo by Tim P. Whitby/Getty Images)

Former minister Richard Harrington told a Sanctuary Foundation conference in Oxford (to mark the anniversary of the war) that the lesson was to put in place an ongoing, permanent machinery for refugee sponsorship – which could be adapted quickly to a future crisis, too.

The effort to welcome Ukrainians has involved more people in more places across the country than ever before – 50,000 applied through the family scheme, because they had relatives here. More than 100,000 have come on the Homes for Ukraine scheme – because tens of thousands of people right across the UK offered to host them.

There are future challenges ahead, of stamina and sustainability. Ukrainians came to Britain on a three-year visa, while hosts were asked to make an initial commitment of six months. A pragmatic decision to increase payments to hosts has helped many to carry on. But around 4,000 Ukrainians have faced homelessness.

Nobody can be sure what proportion of Ukrainians refugees will return home or would like to stay in the UK for longer. Different preferences will reflect different circumstances. By this time next year, it would be good to see a broad, cross-party and civic coalition coalesce around offering Ukrainians the chance to make a choice – with the right to stay and settle in the UK for those who want to, alongside significant UK contributions to reconstructing Ukraine.

Luke Tryl Luke Tryl (Pic: LinkedIn)

Britain’s new welcoming movement can extend beyond Ukraine. Luke Tryl of More in Common says there is no doubt the plight of Ukrainians chimed deeply with the British public as Russia invaded last year. “But it would be a mistake to assume this represents an exclusive special preference for Ukrainians,” he says.

Indeed, More in Common’s forthcoming survey of Homes for Ukraine hosts finds that seven out of 10 of those keen to host again would happily support a family from Afghanistan. Some 150,000 Hong Kongers have come to Britain in the last two years, too – under a new visa scheme with broad political and public support.

Partly because the Homes for Ukraine call was so popular so quickly, a mooted second phase enabling institutional sponsorship did not happen. It has been harder for military charities, faith groups and NGOs to take part in Afghan resettlement, or supporting refugees from across countries and continents.

Sunder Katwala Sunder Katwala

This could be looked at again; and evaluations of the Home for Ukraine and other schemes, such as that for Syrians, could inform our future approach to welcoming refugees. The challenge will be to knit together the welcoming efforts, from crisis response to a sustained movement.

For the moment, however, the political focus remains on small boats. The chaos and danger of Channel crossings is no one’s idea of a controlled and compassionate approach to asylum. What the Homes for Ukraine example shows is that we can find practical, workable responses to humanitarian crises requiring refugee protection when we need to, and the public can be brought onboard as part of the solution.

But that will require new thinking and new approaches, not reheating the empty promises of the year before.

More For You

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’
(From left) Professor Ted Cantle, Sunder Katwala, Sara Khan and John Denham at the event

‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’

“SOCIAL cohesion is not the absence of riots.”

John Denham put that central point pithily at the ‘After the Riots’ cohesion summit last week.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Policy reforms should not halt development’
Environmental policies and grid delays are slowing the delivery of new homes

‘Policy reforms should not halt development’

SINCE 2006, Summix has specialised in securing planning for strategic land and urban, mixed-use regeneration projects.

Working with our development partners, we have successfully delivered more than 6,000 homes in the UK. We continue to bring forward strategic residential development sites with over 18,000 homes in our current pipeline, including a new settlement for 10,000 homes at Worcestershire Parkway, which was recently referenced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her inaugural speech.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Ethnic disparities in IVF success rate highlight access challenges’
According to a recent report, IVF birth rate for Asian patients is 24 per cent, lagging behind 32 per cent for white patients

‘Ethnic disparities in IVF success rate highlight access challenges’

WITH nearly 30 years as an NHS consultant and as a British Asian woman, I am acutely aware of the unique challenges ethnic minority patients face in healthcare, especially on their journey towards parenthood.

This week, National Fertility Awareness Week shines a critical light on the psychological impact of infertility in minority ethnic communities. It is time to confront the barriers and stigmas contributing to inequalities in IVF access and outcomes for BAME patients, and the ways these amplify the mental challenges in what is often already a highly emotional and personal journey.

Keep ReadingShow less