BRITISH prime minister Boris Johnson will face angry lawmakers on Tuesday (19) for the first time since being fined for breaking his own coronavirus laws by attending a party at his Downing Street office.
An embattled Johnson last week became the first modern British leader to be fined for breaking the law after police ruled he had breached lockdown curbs in 2020.
But he has weathered the initial storm and has doggedly defied calls to resign.
He can nonetheless expect a bruising few days now the House of Commons is returning from its Easter break, with MPs demanding to know why he repeatedly insisted that no rules had been broken.
Knowingly misleading parliament is a breach of government ministers' code of conduct, which states they should resign as a result - and opposition lawmakers are adamant he should go.
However, Johnson, 57, is digging in, despite the possibility that he could face further penalties as police continue to investigate numerous rule-breaching events.
He will reportedly try to sideline the controversy with a "business as usual" mantra this week, which includes a two-day visit to India starting on Thursday (21).
"The prime minister will have his say... and will outline his version of events and face questions from MPs," minister Greg Hands told Sky News on Monday (18).
"(He) is getting on with the job, he's delivered, and the government has delivered in anything from the vaccination programme through (to) the strong support for Ukraine."
Attention diverted
Metropolitan Police is investigating dozens of alleged lockdown breaches by Johnson and his staff in the Downing Street complex where he lives and works.
It said last week officers had so far issued more than 50 fines.
The scandal, the latest in a stream of controversies to hit Johnson since last year, left his position hanging by a thread and MPs from his Conservative Party in a dangerously rebellious mood.
But he boosted his survival chances with what is seen as a firm response to the war in Ukraine, which diverted attention away from the furore when he was most vulnerable.
Several Conservative lawmakers who had publicly withdrawn their support for his leadership have reversed course and argued now is not the time for a change of Tory leader.
A growing cost-of-living crisis is also credited with distracting people from the scandal, while Johnson has made several big policy announcements aimed at his pro-Brexit political base.
They include controversial plans to send migrants and asylum seekers who cross the Channel thousands of miles away to Rwanda.
However, commentators doubt he can maintain his party's support if he is repeatedly fined, his Tories fare poorly in local elections next month and further lurid details of parties emerge.
In an ominous sign last Wednesday (13), Simon Wolfson, a justice minister, resigned from the government, citing "the scale, context and nature" of the rule breaches.
'Liar'
Several Tories have also renewed calls for him to step down.
Johnson will bid to shore up his standing with them when he addresses a meeting of the Conservative parliamentary party on Tuesday evening, according to reports.
However, he could face the further embarrassment of lawmakers voting to refer him to a rarely convened parliament committee that would decide whether he had misled them over "partygate".
Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle is said to be considering whether to allow such a vote, amid pressure from opposition parties.
"Boris Johnson defied his own law and then lied and lied and lied," Angela Rayner, Labour's deputy leader, tweeted last Tuesday.
"While the British public were making huge sacrifices, he was rule-breaking."
Johnson’s cabinet colleague Brandon Lewis defended him, telling Sky News on Tuesday that "at every point, he has been clear with what he believes to be the truth".
"What he also accepts is that the police have looked into this particular issue and taken a view that a fine should be issued. He accepts that he has paid that fine, he has apologised for that."
Johnson is undoubtedly hoping voters' anger over "Partygate" has dissipated, but recent polling indicated widespread anger.
One national survey showed around two-thirds of people spoke negatively about him, compared to just 16 per cent positively, with the word "liar" the most commonly shared response.
"Overall, 'Partygate' dominates views of Boris (Johnson) over Ukraine," said James Johnson, a Conservative pollster who conducted the sample.
"Fury has not receded. Many negative comments are by people who liked him previously but have now changed their minds."
(AFP)
Site Navigation
Search
AI Powered
Human content,
AI powered search.
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
More For You
Calls grow for Lisa Nandy to end Telegraph ownership stalemate
Jan 10, 2025
THE SALE of The Telegraph newspaper has drawn widespread political calls for culture secretary Lisa Nandy to intervene and end the prolonged uncertainty surrounding its ownership.
The newspaper has been in limbo for 20 months after an auction process initiated by RedBird IMI, an Abu Dhabi-backed investment fund, failed to secure a suitable buyer.
RedBird IMI had sought to recover over £500 million spent in a deal to acquire the paper from the Barclay family, The Telegraph reported.
The sale process, overseen by investment bankers including former chancellor George Osborne, has been dubbed “the newspaper auction from hell” by the Columbia Journalism Review.
A potential bid by Dovid Efune, publisher of the New York Sun website, has stalled due to insufficient funding. Other interested parties, such as Lord Saatchi, David Montgomery, Paul Marshall, and Todd Boehly, have yet to meet RedBird IMI’s valuation.
Senior politicians across party lines have called for swift resolution. Conservative Shadow Culture Secretary Stuart Andrew stated: “It was right the Tory government at the time scrutinised the takeover move for The Telegraph. Now is the time to ensure certainty for the publication.”
Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey urged action, saying, “The Government must now urgently get a move on and resolve this uncertainty – anything less would be simply unacceptable, and bad for British democracy.”
Labour MP James Frith emphasised the need for both speed and safeguarding media plurality, stating, “Speed alone mustn’t come at the expense of safeguarding the sustainability and plurality of our print media.”
The Telegraph has been managed by independent directors since Lloyds Banking Group seized it from the Barclays in 2023 over unpaid debts.
The culture secretary retains powers to refer the case to the Competition and Markets Authority, which could trigger an investigation into press freedom concerns linked to Abu Dhabi’s involvement, the newspaper reported.
A spokesperson for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said, “The Government is not involved in the sale process of The Telegraph at this stage. This is for RedBird IMI alone.”
Meanwhile, Nandy’s office stated she is prohibited from expressing a view on the case.
The uncertainty continues to weigh on the newspaper’s operations, with editor-in-chief Chris Evans admitting to staff: “There’s obviously a limit to what we can do in these circumstances.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
News
'UK not able to reap benefits of multiculturalism because of prejudiced thinking'
Sarwar Alam
08 June 2023
Labour government reports highest illegal migrant removals since 2018
Jan 10, 2025
THE LABOUR government announced on Thursday that it had removed 16,400 illegal migrants since taking office in July, the fastest rate of removals since 2018.
On taking office, prime minister Keir Starmer scrapped the previous Conservative government's scheme to send migrants who arrive illegally to Rwanda, instead setting up a Border Security Command to crack down on illegal migration – a huge political issue in Britain.
The new system prioritises dismantling the people-smuggling networks that enable migrants to cross into Britain using small boats. It also emphasises detaining and removing individuals living illegally in the country.
“Our message to those wanting to come here illegally is clear – you are wasting your money putting your trust in these vile gangs and will be returned swiftly,” Starmer said in a statement.
The government is also planning to introduce a sanctions regime aimed at leaders of smuggling networks responsible for bringing tens of thousands of people into the country annually.
According to government data, over 36,800 people crossed the Channel in 2024, a 25 per cent increase compared to the previous year. Dozens of migrants have died attempting the journey.
Since the Labour government came to power, enforced returns of illegal migrants have risen by 24 per cent year-on-year. The removals include 2,580 foreign nationals convicted of crimes.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
Asian funding gives Tories an edge over ruling Labour
Jan 10, 2025
ASIAN entrepreneurs and companies have pumped more money into the Conservative party than the ruling Labour, latest data has revealed, with one business leader donating more than £100,000 to the opposition party.
Dr Selvanayagam Pankayachelvan, CEO of Regent Group, a London-based educational firm, emerged as one of the biggest individual Asian donors to the Tories in the third quarter of 2024, data from the Electoral Commission revealed last month.
The Sri Lanka born former accountant gave a total of £125,000 to the party. Dr Pankaj’s enterprise has a number of institutes across the capital, including Regent College in central London.
Other leading businessmen who made major donations to the Tories, either individually or through their businesses, include the Pankhania family, led by father Vraj and his sons Sunil and Kamal; Kulvinder Singh; Suleman Ahmed; Sritharan S Ahilan and Mustafa Tariq Mohammed.
Westcombe Homes Limited, led by the Pankhania family, donated £90,000 to the Tories. Their Westcombe Group has successfully built and managed property portfolios for the past five decades.The West End Medical Practice Limited, based in London, donated £4,000 to the Conservatives. Company directors Bilal Ashraf, Jamal Ashraf, Dr Mohammad Ashraf and Romana Chohan made the contribution between July and September last year. Kulvinder Singh made a one-time donation of £5,000, while Ahilan gave £3,000 and Tariq Mohammed donated £2,200 to the Tories during that period.
The Conservatives received £3.16 million in donations during the three months following the July general election, compared to Labour’s £2.62m.
A Conservative insider said, “Under Kemi Badenoch’s leadership, the party is being revitalised into a formidable political force for the future. In the last quarter, the Conservatives raised more funds than Labour, the Lib Dems, and Reform combined. This demonstrates that only the Conservatives can stand as a strong opposition to the Labour government, which has failed with broken promises, higher taxes, and weak leadership.”
Kamal Pankhania
Labour’s largest Asian donor was Lord Waheed Alli, who contributed £7,985 in the third quarter. During the same period, businessman Arun Patil donated £3,000 to the party.
British Indian businessman Sudhir Choudhrie, currently an adviser on India to the leader of the Liberal Democrats , made a significant donation to the party, contributing £24,000 in the third quarter.
Zalina and Ramesh Dewan were the other major Asian contributors to Lib Dems, as they together donated more than £21,000. Jahir Hussain also made a one-time contribution of more than £3,000 to the party.
Jackie Killeen, director of electoral administration and regulation, said, “Political parties received over £9.6m in donations over the past three months. While this is a noticeable drop from the previous quarter, such a decline is typical following a general election.
“We understand that voters are concerned about the sources of funding, and this report plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency. However, there has been a long-standing decline in public trust regarding the transparency of party and campaigner finances. We continue to urge the UK Government to implement laws that would safeguard parties from those trying to bypass the law and to restore voter confidence by introducing more stringent checks on donor identities.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Two men jailed for trying to smuggle migrants into UK
Jan 09, 2025
TWO London-based men have been sentenced to over 10 years behind bars after being convicted of breaching UK immigration law by trying to smuggle four Indian migrants in a hidden van compartment disguised by a stack of dirty tyres.
According to the UK Home Office, British nationals Shafaz Khan and Choudhry Rashied, who operated under the alias ‘Manzar Mian Attique’, hid the group of migrants behind the tyres in a “purpose built” hidden space in the vehicle.
The pair were sentenced at Isleworth Crown Court in London on Tuesday (7) and each faces five years and three months in prison for facilitating a breach of UK immigration law.
“This case displays the lengths people smugglers will go to to disguise their criminal activity. These smugglers exploited a group of individuals by putting them into an unsafe and unlawful situation for their own financial gain,” said Dame Angela Eagle, UK minister for border security and asylum.
“Our skilled investigators are working tirelessly to protect our borders as part of our Plan for Change and that starts with dismantling the people smuggling networks who put lives at risk and undermine our border security. Alongside the major step up in enforcement action and integral cooperation with key partners we are also investing GBP 150 million of funding into our new Border Security Command to disrupt the criminal smuggling gangs profiting from risking lives,” she said.
The sentencing followed a Home Office investigation that revealed the men hired the van solely for the purpose of people smuggling. They were also found responsible for building the "hide", which was used to conceal the group of migrants.
"Phone analysis revealed the gang had assigned ‘burner’ phones to each other to help conceal their crimes, whilst CCTV traced the pair to a local cafe where they met to plan the illegal facilitation," the Home Office said.
The pair’s "dangerous operation" was shut down when they were stopped by UK Border Force officers at Newhaven Ferry Port on the south coast of England. Khan is said to have told the officers that they were travelling back from Belgium and the rear of their van contained used tyres.
But when officers searched the back of the van, they got more than they bargained for, with a group of migrants discovered in squalid and dangerous conditions hidden behind the heavy tyres with no access to clean air, the Home Office said.
Chris Foster, UK’s Immigration Enforcement Regional Lead, added: “Both Khan and Rashied sold these vulnerable individuals a dream and promised them a safe journey and prosperous life in the UK, which was far from the truth. The people smuggling gangs are playing with people’s lives and undermining our border security, we will not just watch on.
“We are stepping up our enforcement efforts to break the business model of the criminal networks that operate in the UK and Europe. Today’s sentencing sends a clear message to the criminals, if you get involved in people smuggling, you’re likely to spend a lengthy time behind bars.”
He went on to pay tribute to the hard work and tireless efforts of his team to take down the criminal gangs who “profit from this evil trade”.
(PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Four Indians accused of Nijjar’s murder granted bail in Canada
Jan 09, 2025
ALL four Indian nationals accused of murdering Khalistani separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar have been granted bail by a court in Canada.
The accused, identified as Karan Brar, Amandeep Singh, Kamalpreet Singh, and Karanpreet Singh, face charges of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder.
The case, which has drawn international attention, will now proceed at the British Columbia Supreme Court, with the next hearing scheduled for 11 February 2025, as reported by India Today.
Nijjar, a prominent pro-Khalistan leader, was killed in Surrey, British Columbia, in June 2023. His assassination became the focus of a diplomatic row after Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau accused the Indian government of involvement. India has strongly denied these allegations, labelling them as "baseless."
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) arrested the four accused in May 2024 from different locations across Canada. However, delays in evidence presentation by the prosecution during preliminary hearings led to their release under a "stay of proceedings" while awaiting trial. Court records indicate that all four are "not" in custody, meaning they are either out on bail or released under specific conditions.
The Canadian government has employed a "direct indictment," expediting the case to trial by transferring it from Surrey Provincial Court to British Columbia Supreme Court.
A publication ban, requested by the Crown and agreed upon by defence counsel, restricts updates on pre-trial proceedings.
A Prosecution Service official confirmed that pre-trial motions will take place before the trial, but no timeline has been provided.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More
© Copyright 2025 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Garavi Gujarat Publications