Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Unconscious bias’ masking issue of real racial inequality

By Dal Babu

THE Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has shone a light on how organisations are responding to the geological pace of racial equality.


But unconscious bias training, a mandatory requirement in many organisations, is being thrown under the bus.

The concept of ‘unconscious bias’ is a phrase George Orwell (who was a police officer in former Burma) would perhaps have written. An industry has grown up around it, offering expensive training that organisations gratefully accept, so they feel exonerated from words like “discrimination, homophobia, racism and sexism”, allowing them instead to point to some psychological reason imbedded in us for centuries to explain why they are particularly unrepresentative in relation to BAME, gay, women, transgender and disabled people.

The evidence that society has a huge challenge in dealing with diversity in terms of race is all around us – and the police are an obvious example. but not alone. We still do not have a BAME chief constable, and the Senior Command Course 2018, where many future chief constables are chosen, remains stubbornly white.

An industry grew up selling training to remedy this supposedly unknown bias, particularly to public servants in any number of professions. Last week I was struck by a phrase that has become a mainstay of many people in the public sector, but which stops a real debate on racism and inequality in society – “unconscious bias”. This idea was developed and marketed by Universities of Washington and Yale, and called the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Basically, the concept says that we all are prejudiced (not your fault) and you can have some training to rectify the problem.

Suddenly, trainers are less keen to offer unconscious bias training and, instead, are saying that anti-racism training is the must have of a modern, forward-looking organisation. In part, this is due to the need to rebrand to win new business from old customers, but is also due to the conclusion that some organisations have reached that unconscious bias training does not work.

For example, the College of Policing has reported that “supressing stereotypes may result in individuals reverting to holding stereotypical views about an underrepresented group that [the training] was trying to supress”.

For some organisations, this is a disaster. Unconscious bias training represented evidence that they had tried to do something – to change, to improve. Devaluing the training that has been bought and delivered means having to go through the cycle all over again.

Instead of worrying about unconscious bias by whatever name it is to be known from now on, why not address actual, real, deliberate bias? This means taking actions to implement rather than just acknowledge the recommendations made years ago in, say, the Scarman and McPherson inquiry reports. It means taking complaints about explicit, no-holds-barred racism seriously and making examples of those guilty of perpetrating them such as the PC in Northumbria who was disciplined and sacked for racially abusing staff in an Indian takeaway, but then reinstated on appeal.

As a society, we are still riven by hate crimes which themselves are routinely mocked as preoccupations of the “woke” but include violence and murder. Hateful insults shouted in the street are perhaps a gateway crime leading to escalation and violence. It is difficult for an agency such as the police to deal effectively with hate crimes if it cannot adequately deal with hatred among its own members.

When open discrimination and bias, hate crimes and the culture that enables them to take place have been successfully addressed and eliminated, then we can turn to unconscious bias as a target and remove this as the fig leaf from those who would continue to cover their discriminations.

I hope that the geological pace of racial equality will change. BLM will challenge concepts like unconscious bias that organisations have been using for many years with no impact, and seek new ways of ensuring that our organisations are more representative of our society.

More For You

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment
ROOH: Within Her
ROOH: Within Her

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

DRAMATIC DANCE

CLASSICAL performances have been enjoying great popularity in recent years, largely due to productions crossing new creative horizons. One great-looking show to catch this month is ROOH: Within Her, which is being staged at Sadler’s Wells Theatre in London from next Wednesday (23)to next Friday (25). The solo piece, from renowned choreographer and performer Urja Desai Thakore, explores narratives of quiet, everyday heroism across two millennia.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lord Macaulay plaque

Amit Roy with the Lord Macaulay plaque.

Club legacy of the Raj

THE British departed India when the country they had ruled more or less or 200 years became independent in 1947.

But what they left behind, especially in Calcutta (now called Kolkata), are their clubs. Then, as now, they remain a sanctuary for the city’s elite.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Trump new world order brings Orwell’s 1984 dystopia to life

US president Donald Trump gestures while speaking during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC

Getty Images

Comment: Trump new world order brings Orwell’s 1984 dystopia to life

George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four was the most influential novel of the twentieth century. It was intended as a dystopian warning, though I have an uneasy feeling that its depiction of a world split into three great power blocs – Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia – may increasingly now be seen in US president Donald Trump’s White House, Russian president Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin or China president Xi Jingping’s Zhongnanhai compound in Beijing more as some kind of training manual or world map to aspire to instead.

Orwell was writing in 1948, when 1984 seemed a distantly futuristic date that he would make legendary. Yet, four more decades have taken us now further beyond 1984 than Orwell was ahead of it. The tariff trade wars unleashed from the White House last week make it more likely that future historians will now identify the 2024 return of Trump to the White House as finally calling the post-war world order to an end.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the Maharana will be fondly remembered

Maharana Arvind Singh Mewar at the 2013 event at Lord’s, London

Why the Maharana will be fondly remembered

SINCE I happened to be passing through Udaipur [in Rajasthan], I thought I would look up “Shriji” Arvind Singh Mewar.

He didn’t formally have a title since Indira Gandhi, as prime minister, abolished India’s princely order in 1971 by an amendment to the constitution. But everyone – and especially his former subjects – knew his family ruled Udaipur, one of the erstwhile premier kingdoms of Rajasthan.

Keep ReadingShow less
John Abraham
John Abraham calls 'Vedaa' a deeply emotional journey
AFP via Getty Images

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

YOUTUBE CONNECT

Pakistani actor and singer Moazzam Ali Khan received online praise from legendary Bollywood writer Javed Akhtar, who expressed interest in working with him after hearing his rendition of Yeh Nain Deray Deray on YouTube.

Keep ReadingShow less