Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Why making migrants feel welcome matters

Success of Hong Kongers in Britain can be ‘Integration Blueprint’

Why making migrants feel welcome matters

DOWNING STREET had a make-over last week.

There were hanging lanterns in the staircases alongside the portraits of former prime ministers. Cherry blossom and auspicious orchids decorated the reception rooms.


Rishi Sunak was celebrating Lunar New Year, noting that the year of the rabbit’s traditional association with peace and prosperity would be much needed in 2023.

The Lunar New Year framing was a subtle shift from past events billed as marking Chinese New Year. Its broader message was intended to be more inclusive of those in Britain from China, Korea, Vietnam and beyond, placing less emphasis too on the increasingly fractious government-to-government relationship with Beijing.

Simon Cheng and Julian Chan, co-founders of the Hong Kongers in Britain group, felt that this demonstrated a growing UK government understanding in dealing with sensitive, nuanced topics.

Sunak was particularly keen to welcome the UK’s growing community of Hong Kongers, celebrating the fact that 140,000 people had taken up the new British National (Overseas) visa route since it opened two years ago.

“As a Hong Kong filmmaker who is new to this country, I felt very honoured to be invited to the prime minister’s home to celebrate the Lunar New Year,” said Ka Leung Ng, who is curating the Hong Kong film festival which tells new and untold stories of Hong Kongers.

Joyce Chiang of the Welcoming Committee for Hong Kongers added that being invited to Downing Street felt like “a great encouragement” for those doing the work of welcoming, helping new arrivals to find their feet to contribute fully to British society.

Welcoming Hong Kongers to Britain has been an important yet quiet success story. Perhaps its unsung nature partly reflects the absence of any political or public controversy. The decision to invite this wave of migration from Hong Kong was one of the first big immigration policy decisions as to what post-Brexit Britain would choose to do with its new immigration controls. So it is striking that the BN(O) scheme has had pretty much universal support across the parties in parliament, and broad public support too.

The government’s official Hong Kong welcome programme is among the most proactive integration initiatives that Britain has ever had for any incoming group. It has laid solid foundations. Research and engagement find that Hong Kongers feel welcomed in Britain and have made a good start navigating the practical challenges, understanding the UK’s housing markets and how school admissions work.

LEAD Comment Sunder Katwala byline pic 1 Sunder Katwala

This will be a year to reflect more broadly on what makes welcoming work. March sees the first anniversary of the Homes for Ukraine scheme – an emergency response to Russian president Vladimir Putin’s invasion. This followed the evacuation from Afghanistan, where moving families from temporary hotel accommodation into communities has progressed slowly.

Insights from the successes and challenges of welcoming programmes can help illuminate how to make migration work for those who come to Britain and the society they join.

Getting the foundations right matters. Secure status in the UK, fluency in English and stable accommodation are essential. Over half of those who have come from Hong Kong, Ukraine and Afghanistan are children, so ensuring that schools have the confidence and tools to address a range of educational and pastoral challenges makes a big difference.

Helping adults to find work – and to use their skills and qualifications fully – will also contribute to social contact, along with how faith and civic groups can help arrivals understand their new home and contribute to social life here.

This year also marks the 75th anniversary of the arrival of the Windrush, the symbolic starting point for post-war migration and a modern, diverse Britain. These new arrivals from Hong Kong will join the post-war Windrush generation, the Ugandan Asians of half a century ago, the Polish workers who came after 2004, and those who have fled Ukraine and Afghanistan last year, as one of the migration stories of this next decade.

Net migration has been exceptionally high in 2022 for exceptional reasons – the refugees from Ukraine are the largest single group to arrive in one year for a century – but also because of the government’s policy choices. Chancellor Jeremy Hunt expects net migration to come down towards 2019 levels, but he has no plan to push it down further.

The government chose to combine the end of free movement with more open routes from outside Europe, seeking to grow Britain’s share of international students; making it easier for the NHS to fill skills gaps; and opening the Hong Kong route because of historic obligations and the economic and social contribution that Hong Kongers will make here.

The politics of immigration remain dominated by polarising clashes about asylum. How we make welcoming work offers one constructive opportunity to find common ground.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Peace in Middle East hinges on Trump’s volatile decisions’

Israeli military vehicles stationed in Nabatieh, Lebanon, last Sunday (26)

‘Peace in Middle East hinges on Trump’s volatile decisions’

CAN the ceasefire endure for any significant length of time? This would go some way to ameliorating the incredible suffering in the region, but does it all hinge on one man, more than the future of the region has ever depended in its entire history?

Ceasefires can’t hold if no progress is made in addressing the underlying issues that led to the conflict in the first place.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less