Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Why Sadiq Khan needs to thank Lee Anderson

Suspended Tory’s comments likely to help Mayor’s campaign

Why Sadiq Khan needs to thank Lee Anderson

THE London mayoral election is on May 2, so it’s not that far away.

If I were Sadiq Khan, I would be pleased privately by Lee Anderson’s comments about him on GB News: “I don’t actually believe that the Islamists have got control of our country, but what I do believe is they have got control of Khan and they have got control of London… He has actually given our capital city away to his mates.”


In public, Sadiq called Anderson’s remarks “Islamophobic, anti-Muslim and racist” and said: “These comments pour fuel on the fire of anti-Muslim hatred.”

Just over an hour after Sadiq’s criticism, a spokesperson for the Tory party’s chief whip, Simon Hart, announced: “Following his refusal to apologise for comments made yesterday, the chief whip has suspended the Conservative whip from Lee Anderson MP.”

Anderson’s remarks are counterproductive. They will only help Sadiq to win. It will be recalled that in the 2016 mayor election, his Tory challenger, Zac Goldsmith, said Sadiq had “given platforms, oxygen and even cover – over and over and over again – to those who seek to do our police and capital harm”.

He said Sadiq, the Muslim son of a bus driver, “has tried to silence questions about his links [to extremists] by shamelessly accusing anyone who raises them of being Islamophobic”.

Even Zac’s sister, Jemima Khan, had to slap down her brother: “Sad that Zac’s campaign did not reflect who I know him to be – an eco-friendly, independent-mind politician with integrity.”

For helping his campaign, Sadiq should take Anderson to lunch.

The underlying domestic politics of Britain is being poisoned by the Israel-Hamas war. Things will probably calm down once it’s over.

But we do need an immediate ceasefire, not least because Israeli society is being brutalised by the war in ways that it may come to regret later.

LEAD Amit 1 Sadiq Khan GettyImages 1630824949 Sadiq Khan

The reality is that people all over the world have forgotten Hamas’s initial assault on October 7 last year, and are now only concerned about the indiscriminate killing of thousands of Palestinian women and children.

Few people are persuaded by the Israeli government’s argument that in order to target Hamas fighters, its military first has to get past Palestinian civilians.

Prince William was probably thinking of his own children when he said: “I remain deeply concerned about the terrible human cost of the conflict in the Middle East since the Hamas terrorist attack on October 7. Too many have been killed. I, like so many others, want to see an end to the fighting as soon as possible. There is a desperate need for increased humanitarian support to Gaza. It’s critical that aid gets in and the hostages are released.

“Sometimes it is only when faced with the sheer scale of human suffering that the importance of permanent peace is brought home.

“Even in the darkest hour, we must not succumb to the counsel of despair. I continue to cling to the hope that a brighter future can be found and I refuse to give up on that.”

That, I think, is the view of most ordinary people. They are not being anti-Semitic. They don’t understand the complicated politics of the region or that Israel has a point of view.

It is worth remembering that during the Mumbai massacre of 2008, six Jewish people from the Chabad centre, including Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife, were killed by the terrorists.

India is one of the few countries in the world where Jews have always felt safe.

I have visited three synagogues in Kolkata, which are looked after by Muslim caretakers.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

An anti-migrant protest in Glasgow’s Possilpark on July 11, 2026, amid rising tensions and violence over migration across parts of UK

Getty Images

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

Sunder Katwala

IT TOOK three nights of violence in Thetford, Norfolk for the police to restore order. A crowd chanted “get them out” and “deport, deport, deport” as they pelted a house with eggs and smashed the windows. Several dozen people tried to break down the door, hoping to confront the people inside, violently attacking the police who blocked them.

This violent criminality was not political protest, but an attempt at a xenophobic pogrom to drive out asylum seekers housed in the property. The police relocated them elsewhere for their own safety. That felt like ‘mission accomplished’ for the angry crowd. Online, extremists suggested other places could target asylum seekers’ homes to emulate Thetford’s success. Disorder in Belfast and Epping had seen a crime, committed by an asylum seeker, used to mobilise collective punishment against migrants and other ethnic minorities. Nobody involved in the Thetford disorder suggested those in the house targeted had caused any trouble. The mere presence of asylum seekers in the town was perceived as a threat – from “illegals” or “invaders”.

Keep ReadingShow less