Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

You know something, Jon Snow

by BARNIE CHOUDHURY

MANY years ago, the Channel 4 newscaster Jon Snow was a visiting professor of journalism at Nottingham Trent University, where I happened to lecture.


Over the years, I learned from him, and so did my students. When asked by a national newspaper what he would like for his epitaph, Jon cleverly showed how in touch he was with popular culture. He wanted the words: “You know nothing, Jon Snow” on his tombstone, in reference to that brilliant drama The Game of Thrones. Simple. Genius. Typical Jon Snow. To this day, under his stewardship, Channel 4 News remains the programme to watch for any serious journalist.

But Jon has run into trouble after 2,600-odd people complained to the Office of Communications (Ofcom) about an impromptu ad-lib on one of his programmes at the end of March. His crime? During one of the pro-Brexit protests in parliament, the veteran newsman said he had “never seen so many white people in one place”.

As a former member of Ofcom’s advisory committee for England for five years, I get visibly riled up when I hear mention of a person’s skin colour if  it is not germane to the story, as those with whom I served will tell you. With all due respect to my former colleagues, Jon did nothing wrong. He was saying it as he saw it. And, what’s more, he was doing us a public service. He was pointing out something which needed further examination – why were there so few people of colour at this rally?

If you think Brexit has nothing to do with race, then I humbly suggest you are wrong. Brexit has everything to do with race. It goes to the heart of how we see and define ourselves. It is central to our identity. And what is more, Asians have skin in the game. Only, they have not been asked for their views because the media, except for this newspaper, has not asked the question – why would Asians, many of whom are descended from immigrants, vote in favour of Brexit?

It is not because Asians aren’t interested in Brexit. The biggest issue of our time affects business. And remember that according to the 2019 report by Grant Thornton, a global independent firm of tax auditors, 842 Indian companies operate in the UK today, with combined revenues of almost £48 billion. They paid a total of over £684 million in corporation tax, significantly higher than global brands Google, Amazon and Starbucks. So why haven’t we made more of how Asians view Brexit. Yes, we can be notoriously media shy. Yes, we go to great lengths to make sure little gets in the way of making a profit. But we can be coaxed into commenting.

And if we were to ask that question, we would find that unlike four decades ago, things have changed. Asians no longer vote en bloc for Labour. And they are no longer all pro-immigration. In fact, the speed of assimilated thought and attitude in just three gen

erations has been staggering. Asians feel so much a part of Britain that, like many indigenous Britons, they don’t want their country, yes, their country, to be overrun by foreigners. That’s what I found when I asked the question of some Asians around the UK for a chapter in a book on Brexit.

But I guess this is evolution, isn’t it? The same families who sought refuge in Britain after being thrown out by African dictators, those who came here for a better economic life, and those who fought to get their child’s spouse to the UK after an arranged marriage, are now saying they don’t want others to have the same chance. But they appear to be doing so in the typical Asian way, quietly and without fanfare, agitating behind the scenes. Yet it was not always so. We itched to have our voices heard. In the 1970s, we lobbied for race relations laws. In the 1980s, we marched against racists. In the 1990s, we fought for religious discrimination legislation. And in the first decade of this millennium, we successfully ensured a law against forced marriage. We campaigned in the full glare of the media spotlight.

Yet, seemingly, we dare not admit we have changed so much that we are shutting the door to those who only wish to emulate what we have done so successfully by changing country.

Brexit has split communities. It has split families. It has split racial groups but, unusually this time, not along the fault lines of race. And that is why Jon was right to point out what he did that March evening. Sometimes we need to point out the obvious, to get others to think and question assumptions.

  • Barnie Choudhury is a former BBC journalist and a professor of professional practice in communications at the University of Buckingham.

More For You

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment
ROOH: Within Her
ROOH: Within Her

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

DRAMATIC DANCE

CLASSICAL performances have been enjoying great popularity in recent years, largely due to productions crossing new creative horizons. One great-looking show to catch this month is ROOH: Within Her, which is being staged at Sadler’s Wells Theatre in London from next Wednesday (23)to next Friday (25). The solo piece, from renowned choreographer and performer Urja Desai Thakore, explores narratives of quiet, everyday heroism across two millennia.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lord Macaulay plaque

Amit Roy with the Lord Macaulay plaque.

Club legacy of the Raj

THE British departed India when the country they had ruled more or less or 200 years became independent in 1947.

But what they left behind, especially in Calcutta (now called Kolkata), are their clubs. Then, as now, they remain a sanctuary for the city’s elite.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Trump new world order brings Orwell’s 1984 dystopia to life

US president Donald Trump gestures while speaking during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC

Getty Images

Comment: Trump new world order brings Orwell’s 1984 dystopia to life

George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four was the most influential novel of the twentieth century. It was intended as a dystopian warning, though I have an uneasy feeling that its depiction of a world split into three great power blocs – Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia – may increasingly now be seen in US president Donald Trump’s White House, Russian president Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin or China president Xi Jingping’s Zhongnanhai compound in Beijing more as some kind of training manual or world map to aspire to instead.

Orwell was writing in 1948, when 1984 seemed a distantly futuristic date that he would make legendary. Yet, four more decades have taken us now further beyond 1984 than Orwell was ahead of it. The tariff trade wars unleashed from the White House last week make it more likely that future historians will now identify the 2024 return of Trump to the White House as finally calling the post-war world order to an end.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the Maharana will be fondly remembered

Maharana Arvind Singh Mewar at the 2013 event at Lord’s, London

Why the Maharana will be fondly remembered

SINCE I happened to be passing through Udaipur [in Rajasthan], I thought I would look up “Shriji” Arvind Singh Mewar.

He didn’t formally have a title since Indira Gandhi, as prime minister, abolished India’s princely order in 1971 by an amendment to the constitution. But everyone – and especially his former subjects – knew his family ruled Udaipur, one of the erstwhile premier kingdoms of Rajasthan.

Keep ReadingShow less
John Abraham
John Abraham calls 'Vedaa' a deeply emotional journey
AFP via Getty Images

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

YOUTUBE CONNECT

Pakistani actor and singer Moazzam Ali Khan received online praise from legendary Bollywood writer Javed Akhtar, who expressed interest in working with him after hearing his rendition of Yeh Nain Deray Deray on YouTube.

Keep ReadingShow less