Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

You know something, Jon Snow

by BARNIE CHOUDHURY

MANY years ago, the Channel 4 newscaster Jon Snow was a visiting professor of journalism at Nottingham Trent University, where I happened to lecture.


Over the years, I learned from him, and so did my students. When asked by a national newspaper what he would like for his epitaph, Jon cleverly showed how in touch he was with popular culture. He wanted the words: “You know nothing, Jon Snow” on his tombstone, in reference to that brilliant drama The Game of Thrones. Simple. Genius. Typical Jon Snow. To this day, under his stewardship, Channel 4 News remains the programme to watch for any serious journalist.

But Jon has run into trouble after 2,600-odd people complained to the Office of Communications (Ofcom) about an impromptu ad-lib on one of his programmes at the end of March. His crime? During one of the pro-Brexit protests in parliament, the veteran newsman said he had “never seen so many white people in one place”.

As a former member of Ofcom’s advisory committee for England for five years, I get visibly riled up when I hear mention of a person’s skin colour if  it is not germane to the story, as those with whom I served will tell you. With all due respect to my former colleagues, Jon did nothing wrong. He was saying it as he saw it. And, what’s more, he was doing us a public service. He was pointing out something which needed further examination – why were there so few people of colour at this rally?

If you think Brexit has nothing to do with race, then I humbly suggest you are wrong. Brexit has everything to do with race. It goes to the heart of how we see and define ourselves. It is central to our identity. And what is more, Asians have skin in the game. Only, they have not been asked for their views because the media, except for this newspaper, has not asked the question – why would Asians, many of whom are descended from immigrants, vote in favour of Brexit?

It is not because Asians aren’t interested in Brexit. The biggest issue of our time affects business. And remember that according to the 2019 report by Grant Thornton, a global independent firm of tax auditors, 842 Indian companies operate in the UK today, with combined revenues of almost £48 billion. They paid a total of over £684 million in corporation tax, significantly higher than global brands Google, Amazon and Starbucks. So why haven’t we made more of how Asians view Brexit. Yes, we can be notoriously media shy. Yes, we go to great lengths to make sure little gets in the way of making a profit. But we can be coaxed into commenting.

And if we were to ask that question, we would find that unlike four decades ago, things have changed. Asians no longer vote en bloc for Labour. And they are no longer all pro-immigration. In fact, the speed of assimilated thought and attitude in just three gen

erations has been staggering. Asians feel so much a part of Britain that, like many indigenous Britons, they don’t want their country, yes, their country, to be overrun by foreigners. That’s what I found when I asked the question of some Asians around the UK for a chapter in a book on Brexit.

But I guess this is evolution, isn’t it? The same families who sought refuge in Britain after being thrown out by African dictators, those who came here for a better economic life, and those who fought to get their child’s spouse to the UK after an arranged marriage, are now saying they don’t want others to have the same chance. But they appear to be doing so in the typical Asian way, quietly and without fanfare, agitating behind the scenes. Yet it was not always so. We itched to have our voices heard. In the 1970s, we lobbied for race relations laws. In the 1980s, we marched against racists. In the 1990s, we fought for religious discrimination legislation. And in the first decade of this millennium, we successfully ensured a law against forced marriage. We campaigned in the full glare of the media spotlight.

Yet, seemingly, we dare not admit we have changed so much that we are shutting the door to those who only wish to emulate what we have done so successfully by changing country.

Brexit has split communities. It has split families. It has split racial groups but, unusually this time, not along the fault lines of race. And that is why Jon was right to point out what he did that March evening. Sometimes we need to point out the obvious, to get others to think and question assumptions.

  • Barnie Choudhury is a former BBC journalist and a professor of professional practice in communications at the University of Buckingham.

More For You

Comment: Can Starmer government find the antidote to populist politics?

Keir Starmer

Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer government find the antidote to populist politics?

Donald Trump’s second inauguration as America's President next week is the sequel that few of us here wanted to see. Trump was the democratic choice of 50% of America's voters again this time, baffling most people on this side of the Atlantic. We share a common language and many cultural influences, but Britain is not America when it comes to politics.

But how confident can we be that Britain will not become as deeply divided as Donald Trump's America? The frenzy with which Elon Musk made himself the main character, opening this year in British politics, showed how technology shrinks the ocean between us. Britain is far from immune from the populist, polarised politics that took Trump to victory. This is a less deeply divided society than America, but the next four years are likely to see that tested as never before.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cambridge shaped Manmohan Singh’s economic vision

Manmohan Singh

Cambridge shaped Manmohan Singh’s economic vision

DR MANMOHAN SINGH’S passing at the age of 92 on December 26 reminds me of my interview with the then prime minister of India in 2006 in Delhi. He told me his economic thinking had been shaped to a great extent by his time in Cambridge.

The man credited with opening up India to globalisation, serving as minister of finance from 1991 to 1996 under prime minister PV Narasimha Rao, said he viewed economics as a tool to help the poorest in society.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Dealing with Trump and Musk may dominate the politics of 2025

Elon Musk (L) and Donald Trump

Getty Images

Comment: Dealing with Trump and Musk may dominate the politics of 2025

How to deal with US president-elect Donald Trump may dominate global politics in 2025. The question generates existential concern in Ukraine, but a sense of opportunity in Moscow and Tel Aviv. India's growing status makes prime minister Narendra Modi’s government less nervous about another Trump era than most. Anxiety about security, trade and diplomacy dominates European capitals.

Keir Starmer’s British government will seek as much ‘business as usual’ as possible in such volatile times. It may sound like wishful thinking, but no obvious alternative strategy is available. Peter Mandelson’s mission in Washington as UK ambassador will be to limit the damage that tariffs could do to economic growth, or that erratic diplomacy might do to NATO.The new year proved there will be no mutual non-aggression pact from Trump’s allies in America, as Elon Musk embarked on a freelance mission to destroy Starmer’s government.

Keep ReadingShow less
Football with Faris: The week’s hottest stories from the beautiful game

Despite a new manager in Arne Slot, Liverpool have taken this season by storm, only dropping points in three out of the 14 games they’ve played. (Photo: Getty Images)

Football with Faris: The week’s hottest stories from the beautiful game

By: Faris Gohir

The Premier League title race has heated up. Which teams are favourites for Champions League places? Which teams are as good as relegated, and who is the surprise package? Time for a mid-season wrap-up.

Keep ReadingShow less
Dangers of culture wars and how to defuse them

Kemi Badenoch

Getty Images

Dangers of culture wars and how to defuse them

Kemi Badenoch has decided to be out and proud as a culture warrior. “It is meant to be pejorative, but I love the title the left-wing media give me”, she told her Washington DC audience last week. “I believe in tradition. And if we don’t defend our culture, who will?”, the Conservative leader said, even declaring herself to be “descended from warriors”.

Since most people don't want a culture war, British politicians usually blame the other side for starting them. Even now, while embracing the label, Badenoch will return to her earlier complaint that the term is a ‘dog whistle’ to delegitimise conservative voices. Labour Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy had used her very first speech in the role to declare that “the era of culture wars is over”. Badenoch’s appetite for the cultural argument illustrates why unilateral disarmament of cultural conflict is challenging. So how could we ‘call off’ the culture wars - or at least defuse unconstructive arguments about identity?

Keep ReadingShow less